Hello Sonja,
so far both names are accepted in the plantlist and no synonyms for each other.
dactylifer:
http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-8127
http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/979838-1
longispathaceus:
http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-8211
http://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:ls... g:names:84388-1
It may be that dactylifer, which was only described by Wilbert Hetterscheid as a (own) species in 1994, was again assigned longispathaceus (description 1911 by Engler); Maybe the differences were too great to allow dactylifer to continue as a separate species...
Both species were also verified by Wilbert Hetterscheid in 1994.
The distribution area seems to be identical.
With the variability of dactylifer, the flower could also fit longispathaceus, but this only applies to the outer view; may be that small differences in the flower organs may justify the species differentiation.
https://alangallowaybotanicals.com/plant.../id/dactylifer/
http://phytoimages.siu.edu/imgs/pelserpb... ifer_41700.html
http://phytoimages.siu.edu/cgi-bin/dol/d... s&rank=binomialalthough I do not know if the last two left are reliable, I want to say whether the plants in the pictures have been correctly identified as longispathaceus....
I ask the experts of friends....
Happy id-ing, Bernhard.