Amorphophallus-Forum.de

Hello Harvey,

Surely it can't be said in size yet, I suppose it's a young plant.
One possibility would be A. ravenii, the gloss and shape of the leaves would fit, but in Laos there are many amorphophallus, surely this will not be said until it is larger and ideally has bloomed.
(A. khammouanensis is said to be similarly ravenii according to literature, but I have never seen it myself)

Please keep us informed anyway...

Greetings
Michael

... I'm curious about your report!
Michael

Hello harvey,

the leaf looks so different from the first two leaves (not shiny and smooth, also not so roundish (about that could also be a juvenile feature)), so that it already looks like a different kind.
Possibly pictures of the leaf stalks would still be helpful...

I couldn't give a tip based on the previous pictures...

Happy,
Bernhard.

Hello harvey,

thank you for the picture, but also does not court vile, since mainly the envelope of the leaf stalk can be seen.

The plants are simply still too small to give a rel safe tip.

But I got the info from Bjorn Malkmus-Hussein:
"Hello Bernhard,
I cannot say too much about that either. The two young plants could well be A. ravenii. But at this size, no species can really be fixed.
A. khammouanensis is excluded, the leaf feathers look different. In addition, this is known only by type location - and it is located elsewhere. Many of the newly described Laotian species have a seemingly very small and sharply delineated range and have not been found outside the type site.
Greeting, Bjorn"

So you have to let them grow a little bit; Maybe you can say more or you even have to wait until flowering....

Happy id-ing, Bernhard.