Amorphophallus-Forum.de

Hello together,

This is rather A. fargesii - eg here: flowers 2016 post #3
or with me: index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 3503 index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 3504 index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 3505 index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 3506

Happy growing and greetings, also unbekanterweise to colleagues,
Bernhard.

Hello

It could involve franchetianum A.; I had times both types and could hardly distinguish them.

See also:

http://www.aroid.org/genera/speciespage...s=franchetianum


Many greetings
Ortwin

Hi Ortwin,.

If not, what could you tell them apart?
Did you have to cut the flower, able to see the details?

Happy id-ing,
Bernhard.

Hi Ortwin,.
Hi Jan and Timo.

It is I noticed just at the second reading of the page, that Wilbert's Hetterscheidt (so the text written above has) and Pascal Bruggemann have agreed that the two species probably not as a species can be distinguished or should...

Well, you what now writes on the label?

Anyway... Happy growing,
Bernhard.

Hi Bernard,.

Thank you very much for the Info;
that was not at all I noticed.

A. on my label now stands fargesii.

Many greetings
Ortwin

Zitat aus: http://www.aroid.org/genera/speciespage.…s=franchetianum

"If ever two species caused problems of identifying these are the ones: A. franchetianum and A. fargesii . The pictures here represent two extremes of a continuum of forms, varying mainly in degree of curvature of the spathe hood. After investigating many, many plants in cultivation, comparing the original diagnoses etc., Pascal Bruggeman and I came to conclude that there is no stable character combination to separate these two "species" definitively. Therefore I have treated them on this website as one species, A. franchetianum."

Wenn man der Argumentation folgt, müßte man evtl eher franchetianum nehmen..... - aber ich lass auch fargesii auf dem Etikett stehen, da ich sie als solche bekommen habe.....

Happy growing, Bernhard.