Hello of Andreas,
I have documented the reviews of the provider at the time and it emerges that he until Sept 2008 only revierii, konjac and offered paeoniifolius (with a picture of prainii, "on loan"), then each additional,
from 11.2008 prainii
from 1.2009 bulbifer
from 1.2009 kachinensis, titanum
After 2.2009, consmilis, ankarana
impressus from 3.2009
from 4.2009 yunnanensis, hernryi
from 5.2010 care, hottae, U.S. silvae and gigas
2010 two Amorpho-friends and I have made test purchases and invariably konjac get; We have been then that the reviews expressed, which by the provider at the time according to recognized...
Alone with the us clearly as konjac decus-silvae, hottae and beccarii he took more than €1000 (you can in his feedback on ebay find) specific titanum, kachinensis. If you then ankarana, etc. still count...
Who are the reviews want to look at, this one can do (from the penultimate page and younger):
http://feedback.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=0 & mPg = 7 & page = 2
Two other Amorpho friends who gather also Epiphyllum and orchids, BTW the purchased species / varieties as wrong declared identified (see neg reviews...)
A few months after 2.2011 (after offer Nr. 290523689995) the provider has set its sales, but until then always still prainii, henryi, kachiensis, impressus, bulbifer, paeoniifolius and ankarana also sold...
In the following years offers of the rare species appeared from time to time, who were clearly konjac; some clearly on the incorrectly declared konjac of the vendor took back.
So much for the...
Beautiful Sunday, Bernhard.