Amorphophallus-Forum.de

Hi andi,.

This is a question that also already has... has bothered me - I had a Yes ever paeoniifolius from a secure source. (which had a nice smooth stem) - which was but me over jordan - now I got studded back different but somehow which get - are who most Sanders.
by ronny here in the forum I got me this year times koratensis control 2 leave - which now are also very studded most common and are also very different in colour...

now I have pictures of paeoniifolius on the facebook-amorpho page seen recently where an an extreme relief-Sanders had - from here that can not the difference be - so whether smooth or rough surface...

but so how I have remembered the paeoniifolius has not reproduces via Rhizome and has only one tribe made - and the 2 koratensis I make right now several tribes - and that from start-so I guess, that difference which then must - be because of the stains and the NAP made Yes really extremely similar to are the two types.

This is roughly estimated/advised as seedling virtually indistinguishable - only from the 2 - 3 period...

Hello of Andreas,

I had bought me also once "paeonifolius" on eBay. I had doubts that it was really paeonifolius. After a request from aroid-L turned out, that it is probably koratensis. Both types are hardly to distinguish seedling. Koratensis forms but the more Varation on different Petiolen. I even have some from almost black to brown-red to completely green.

There is already a secure difference. Kept it completely dry the tubers during the dormant period and the tubers dry up, so it's probably koratensis (these must be stored slightly moist). All tubers in the humid Sphagnum well through the dormant period came with me, while all (really all without exception!) dry stored tubers are dried up.

I've unzip shot until the flowering some plants with beautiful Petiolen next to kultivieren. Then you know exactly what it is.
This will take but a few years.


Greeting
Ortwin

Hello Lord.Maso,

paeoniifolius is quite variable as regards the roughness and the drawing of the part of the sheet.

The smooth clones are, so far as I know the cultivated, which are grown as a tuber vegetable in Asia and have been selected mainly on low oxalate content.

I had pulled myself once paeonifolius one from seed, I had bought on ebay, but the plant is eingegagen, me after she was already more than small.
Image from October 2010
R.I.P.

A few months ago a kambotschanischer student bought me two tuber from his Heimtdorf, who is also primary Cormels or-ausläufer.


The larger the tuber has made now a leaf ca 1.6 m and I hope that the tuber is again as large as it was before transplanting...
The petiole is smooth...


Happy growing, Bernhard.

Thank you for your comments... bernhard

But how to recognize you now really the difference between koratensis and paeoniifolius?

Hello Lord.Maso,

on the leaf or petiole the distinction seems difficult, if probably I suspect, that the bright spots on the petiole at koratensis are more elongated and paeoniifolius this reddish brown coloring is not so common.

Compare images in: paeonifolius seeds for i-Bah

Then the difference in storage - at paeoniifolius remains which usually leads to the desiccation of the tubers at foratensis my opinion absolutely dry storage (without substrate) to new shoots.

Otherwise, the patience proposed by Ortwin remains up to the flower...

Happy growing, Bernhard.

Hello of Andreas,

That would be super interesting koratensis like then the seedlings will look.
My seeds then looked like on the right picture.

Comes across as only on the images or the seeds no longer so good look like?

VG
Ronny

Hello of Andreas,

Here the pictures of the paeoniifoius which I bought in March 2012 Squeeky Buffalo (unfortunately without scale)

index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 2603 index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 2604

So, look for me more after your koratensis Bjorn, but for the notes, which were rechechiert in other place that should be probably yes paeoniifolius...

If you find the time, images of seedlings and the further development of plant loading on all cases once up here - it is perhaps a more revealing comparison.

VG, Bernhard