Amorphophallus-Forum.de

We still do not

HI Bernhard,

I will ask our Kustos to inquire in Heidelberg. Normally the plant would still have to exist there, because it is quite robust.

Greeting

Jan and Timo

Hi Bernard,.

I have asked the curator of Heidelberg, Dr. Andreas Franzke to the Gonatopus and sent him your flower photos. His answer:

"when Wilbert says that that is from Heidelberg, then I want to believe that on the one hand like, but the conclusion is andereseits, it is also a real rough collection certainly somewhat overestimated (versus getting someone else):"


In our database there are only these Gonatopus - accessions:


104519 or 106892, both surviving old stocks, each with the history of this provision:


"16.09.2013: determination (inspection) by D. Safi (BG Lyon) by Gonatopus boivinii (Decne.)" Also known as"to" Gonatopus cf. " angustus N.E.Br." ("boivinii" is wrong with safety)


And there were times 142253 as Gonatopus boivinii a legacy (signed 2001) ran, also.


In all this, no levy at Bochum is listed, but of course does not mean that happened may yet.


It was about your part in the Araceae Forum Yes it even (?) a few years ago:


http://www.Amorphophallus-Forum.de/index... languageCode = en


... see in particular the entry "Tuesday, November 3, 2015 08:54"


It may be natural that there was once more Akzesionen, geschschafft have it is not up to the modern recording and you could - as proposed there - the corresponding field books 3 to 5 durchfortsten, but whether a there may be found on collection then really is one of your accession is certainly only get. As almost always, without any number is a mapping auschichtslos. actually"


No really new insights, but still nice

Greeting,
Timo

Very apart the small flower
You're right, the leaf shape by David Scherberichs plant fit - even if the flower looks slightly different.

greeting,
Jan and Timo

Beautiful thing. Is already pretty small. Let's see what says Wilbert.
Greeting,
Jan and Timo