Sie sind nicht angemeldet.

Lieber Besucher, herzlich willkommen bei: Amorphophallus-Forum.de. Falls dies Ihr erster Besuch auf dieser Seite ist, lesen Sie sich bitte die Hilfe durch. Dort wird Ihnen die Bedienung dieser Seite näher erläutert. Darüber hinaus sollten Sie sich registrieren, um alle Funktionen dieser Seite nutzen zu können. Benutzen Sie das Registrierungsformular, um sich zu registrieren oder informieren Sie sich ausführlich über den Registrierungsvorgang. Falls Sie sich bereits zu einem früheren Zeitpunkt registriert haben, können Sie sich hier anmelden.

1

Sonntag, 24. Juni 2007, 11:28

Bestimmungshilfe

Hello
This AMO spec. has come to me. So A. is not bibifer, because I see no Blattbulben.

index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 347

Erwin

2

Sonntag, 24. Juni 2007, 19:35

Hello

A picture of the petiole would be good, the hand is not so meaningful;-)

Has A. than ever sheet Cormels bulbifer? I mean could be the plant not to young or so?

LG,
Martina

3

Montag, 25. Juni 2007, 08:25

So in size, such as the plant on the image be seen, would she make in any case Blattbulben.

I concur but my speaker. A picture of the tribe would be meaningful.

Gruss Stephan

4

Montag, 25. Juni 2007, 19:59

Petiole

Also gerne hier ist die Petiole

index.php?page=Attachment&attachmentID=348 index.php?page=Attachment&attachmentID=349

Ich habe noch ein Vergleichsbild eines A. bulbifer
index.php?page=Attachment&attachmentID=350

5

Montag, 25. Juni 2007, 20:05

A. bulbifer

Here is a pic of A. bulbifer again but from above with the Blattbulben

index.php? page = attachment & attachmentID = 351

6

Dienstag, 26. Juni 2007, 09:21

Bestimmungshilfe

and no one has an idea???:icon_erschreckt:

7

Sonntag, 1. Juli 2007, 10:11

???????????????

Hello
the AMO. spec still no Blattbulben drives, thus, but A. retires bulbifer. What do you mean? Does anyone have an idea what it is for an Amorphophallus?
Erwin

8

Montag, 2. Juli 2007, 15:01

Ey ey ey

People,

I think the thing with the petiole is not really economical.
I have a photo vo A. konkanensis seedlings seen, because everything was going from solid green, Brown, stained and all intermediate values. Forget it...
Also experiments with bulbous forms are already often failed, insbesodnere when the tubers were imported....

If the plant is older could be at least about the size of the sheet screen and smaller species from schlißen...

I thought the first impression made on a A.paeonifolius, but I want to try not only because...

What we lack is already a Genlobor a Amorpho schnelltest, but who?
Gruß Thorsten

Philipp

Fortgeschrittener

Beiträge: 238

Wohnort: Oberbayern

  • Nachricht senden

9

Montag, 2. Juli 2007, 17:05

Hi Erwin,.

the pattern reminds me also of one paeoniifolius, but it lacks the rough surface. It could be then only one paeoniifolius bangkokensis, but there would be the pattern again quite untypical...

I think you will have to wait in any case for a flower. Here is a pic of that illustrates the problem with the petioles, all the plants are one and the same type (namely A. koratensis):

http://www.dragocactoid.com/images/amorp…P02-600x401.jpg

MfG Philipp

P.S.: See I a Sarracenia rubra on your bulbifer image there? ;-)

10

Montag, 2. Juli 2007, 21:21

@Philipp

Oh, had me in the variety missed (i.e. not A. konkanensis, what solls). That is exactly the photo and is from Ken Mosher and it is very convincing as I find....
Gruß Thorsten

11

Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007, 08:23

Sarracenia

@ Philipp
Yes you really saw it is a Sarracenia rubra SSP.. Rubra.
Protozoans are my first plant focuses on the overall theme of peat bed with accompanying plants such as also the bog orchids and many other bog plants. But I focused here hence Moor bedding on the hardiest species. I kultiviere this peat beds in the tubs on the terrace and build / plant also for other such mud bucket for bed and balcony
Erwin

Philipp

Fortgeschrittener

Beiträge: 238

Wohnort: Oberbayern

  • Nachricht senden

12

Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007, 13:06

@ Tony: Yes, this picture has me also totally baffled. I always thought that A. konjac would be the most variable type, but this photo has taught then better me...
Who knows, perhaps because even natural hybrids stuck in it? Would not surprise me if the A. used to agriculture paeoniifolius munter would intersect with the natural species...

@ Erwin: my focus is also on the Fleischis, I prefer the term carnivores instead Insectivores but because so many do not feed on insects.
I got that from all climate zones and of course various companion plants. My bog Garden was too impractical for me, therefore is the most in the greenhouse now.
Now I am focusing but also quite strong on the Araceae, my collection so is a colorful mess from different groups of plants with very different requirements. Because maintaining almost underway degenerates out then;-)

MfG Philipp

Übersetzen:

  Deutsch  Englisch  Dänisch  Spanisch  Persisch  Französisch  Kroatisch  Italienisch  Japanisch  Niederländisch  Polnisch  Russisch  Schwedisch  Türkisch 

Translation powered by Bing Translation

Sie sind nicht angemeldet. | Anmelden | Registrieren | Passwort vergessen ?